Married At First Sight EXCLUSIVE: The BRUTAL motive half the spouses were edited from this finale – and some are’mad’ their interviews were not revealed on TV
Married At First Sight’s seventh year eventually came to an end on Sunday night.
But audiences only have to see half of the couples really sit facing the relationship pros and reflect in their (largely ) unsuccessful relationships.
Regardless of the fact 24 participants had assembled for the reunion, several of these were edited and given only a couple of seconds of airtime.
Edited outside: Ran First Sight’s seventh year concluded on Sunday, however, audiences just got to watch half the 12 couples sit facing the connection experts due to their habitual debrief
A source told Daily Mail Australia there have been 2 reasons why a few couples were not revealed they were too controversial, or too dull.
‘The manufacturers wanted to end the season with a bang and a number of the couples’ sections were simply dull and there wasn’t anything left to say’ the British stated.
‘Their problems had been solved earlier in the year, therefore that they needed to concentrate on the larger storylines’.
The exes that hardly appeared on display were: Amanda Micallef and Tash Herz, Josh Pihlak along with Cathy Evans, Chris Nicholls along with Vanessa Romito, Poppy Jennings along with Luke Eglin, Natasha Spencer along with Mikey Pembroke, along with Drew Brauer and KC Osborne.
Ouch! A source told Daily Mail Australia that there have been two reasons why a few couples were not revealed: they were too controversial, or too dull. Pictured: Josh Pihlak along with Cathy Evans, also Tash Herz along with Amanda Micallef
It is also known that a few of the participants had been stored far from the cameras because of concerns over what they’d say regarding their partners.
weekly, Chris Nicholls supported this rumour in a meeting using NW magazine.
He maintained he was not given moment on the couch because manufacturers worried his ex-‘spouse ‘,” Vanessa Romito, could create defamatory and untrue claims .
‘I had been informed I was being shielded by not committing Vanessa a stage,’ he explained.
Wild cards: It has known a number of these participants were stored far from the cameras because of concerns over what they’d say regarding their spouses. Pictured: MAFS relationship specialists Mel Schilling,” Dr Trisha Stratford and John Aiken
Meanwhile, a few of the participants were’mad’ about Sunday night if their scenes were not aired on tv.
The origin clarified:’Many’d spent planning exactly what they’d say in the reunion, realizing that it was likely to be the last major moment. Some learned traces.
‘However, in the long run, they can have just stayed in the home rather than bothered’
Drama: weekly, Chris Nicholls (right) stated he was stored away from the cameras since manufacturers dreaded Vanessa Romito (abandoned ) would create defamatory and false promises regarding him